Gunmen Abduct Adelabu's Sister,twin daughters

Gunmen on Wednesday abducted the younger sister of former Minister of Power and leading All Progressives Congress (APC) governorship aspirant in Oyo State, Chief Adebayo Adelabu, alongside her twin sons in Ibadan.

The victims, identified as Mrs. Olaide Busayo Adegoke John-Paul, 43, and her 12-year-old twin sons, Peter and Paul, were reportedly kidnapped at about 7:30 a.m. while she was taking the children to school.

The incident was confirmed in a statement issued by Comrade Femi Awogboro, Media Aide to Chief Adelabu, on behalf of the family.

According to the statement, armed men intercepted Mrs. John-Paul and her children and whisked them away to an unknown destination.

Mrs. John-Paul is the youngest of the five children of Mrs. Olufunmilayo Aduke Adegoke Adelabu. She recently retired from service after working at the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and First Bank Pension Custodian.

The statement disclosed that after her retirement last year, she relocated to Ibadan with her children while preparing to join her husband, Mr. John Paul, who had earlier moved to the United States of America.

The family said security agencies were immediately notified following the incident and had commenced investigations aimed at rescuing the victims and bringing the perpetrators to justice.

"We are pleased to confirm that security operatives have swung into action and preliminary investigations have commenced in earnest. Efforts are currently ongoing to ensure the safe rescue of the victims and the apprehension of those responsible for this heinous crime," the statement read.

Chief Adelabu and members of his family expressed deep concern over the abduction but maintained confidence in the ability of security agencies to secure the release of the victims.

The family appealed to members of the public to remain calm and avoid spreading unverified information that could undermine ongoing rescue efforts.

They also called on Nigerians to offer prayers and support during the difficult period and urged anyone with useful information that could assist investigators to promptly report it to the appropriate authorities.

The abduction has heightened concerns over insecurity in parts of Oyo State and renewed calls for stronger measures to combat kidnapping and other violent crimes.

As of press time, security agencies had yet to issue an official statement on the incident, while efforts to secure the release of Mrs. John-Paul and her children were continuing.

Fear and Tension Grip Oyo as Private Schools, business Shut Down Over Protests for Abducted Pupils, Teachers

 

IBADAN — Fear, uncertainty and growing public anger swept across Oyo State on Tuesday as several private schools shut down operations and businesses closed their doors amid sustained protests demanding the release of school children and teachers abducted in Oriire Local Government Area near Ogbomoso.

The protests, which began on Monday and continued into Tuesday, caused major disruptions across Ibadan, particularly around the University of Ibadan and the Oyo State Secretariat, where demonstrators occupied sections of major roads, resulting in hours-long traffic gridlock and forcing many commuters to abandon their journeys.

The demonstrations, triggered by the continued captivity of the abducted pupils and teachers, have heightened security concerns among parents, school owners and business operators, prompting precautionary closures of schools and commercial establishments across parts of the state.

A commercial driver, Mr. Tunde Michael, recounted the ordeal faced by motorists during the protests.

"The situation was serious. The protesters blocked the University of Ibadan gate and we the commercial drivers and others were held in traffic for hours. The situation only reduced by afternoon when the police came and urged the protesters to leave the road to the roadside."

Commercial activities were equally affected as traders at Bodija Market, Preboye Shopping Complex and the Agbowo axis shut down their businesses over fears that hoodlums might hijack the demonstrations.

Mrs. Joy Giwa, a trader in the city, said she remained indoors until reports emerged that the protesters had dispersed.

"I only opened my shop this afternoon because of the protesters. I stayed back in my house because I was scared of the situation. I need to be sure that all is well before I came out so as not to run into trouble. I only came out this afternoon when I received the news that the protesters had left."

The impact of the crisis has also spread to the education sector, with several private schools advising parents to keep their children at home until the security situation improves.

One concerned parent, Mrs. Monday, said her son's school informed parents that academic activities would be suspended from Wednesday.

"My son's school sent out a message that we should not bring our children to school from Wednesday because of the tense situation in the state. They told us to keep our children at home till Monday. I'm just worried about how this issue is resulting in such a big problem for everyone in Oyo State."

School proprietors said the decision was taken to safeguard pupils, teachers and support staff amid fears that the protests could escalate or create opportunities for criminal elements to operate.

The prolonged captivity of the abducted children and teachers has continued to generate outrage across Oyo State, with civil society groups, parents and education stakeholders demanding urgent action from security agencies and government authorities.

As tension persists, residents say their greatest concern remains the safe return of the victims whose ordeal has disrupted education, commerce and daily life across the state.

CP Bode Ojajuni Assures Ogun Residents of Safety, Debunks Banditry Reports in Ota, Ifo

T

he Commissioner of Police in Ogun State, CP Bode Ojajuni, has reassured residents that the state remains safe and secure, dismissing reports of alleged bandit attacks on schools and communities in Ota, Ifo, and adjoining areas as false and misleading.

Ojajuni, through a statement issued on Monday by the Police Public Relations Officer, DSP Oluseyi Babaseyi, said there had been no incident of banditry, kidnapping, terrorism, or any form of security breach anywhere in the state.

The Commissioner stated that reports circulating on social media alleging attacks on Oluke Community High School, Sango Ota High School in the Ijoko axis, Fadunsin Area of Ijoko, Atan-Ota, Sango-Ota, Agbado, Ifo, and neighbouring communities were entirely unfounded.

According to him, police operatives were immediately deployed to the affected areas following the circulation of the reports to verify the claims and reassure residents through confidence-building patrols.

He disclosed that the Command's School Protection Squad, working with Divisional Police Officers in the affected jurisdictions, conducted security assessments of the schools mentioned in the reports.

The exercise, he said, confirmed that all schools were safe, secure, and fully operational, with academic activities proceeding uninterrupted throughout the day.

"The schools remained peaceful and students as well as staff completed their academic activities without any disruption," the statement noted.

Ojajuni expressed concern over the anxiety generated by the spread of unverified information and urged residents to rely on official channels for security updates.

The Commissioner also clarified the circumstances surrounding the arrest of 38 foreign nationals in Kajola-Ilese, Atan-Ota, an incident which some social media users had allegedly linked to banditry.

According to the police, the suspects, comprising 19 males and 19 females from Côte d'Ivoire and aged between 25 and 35 years, were arrested following credible intelligence.

Preliminary investigations revealed that the individuals could not provide valid immigration or travel documents. They reportedly claimed to have entered Nigeria for online business activities.

The police explained that after preliminary procedures, the suspects were handed over to the Nigeria Immigration Service for further investigation and appropriate action in accordance with immigration regulations.

Ojajuni stressed that the operation had no connection whatsoever with banditry, kidnapping, terrorism, or any violent criminal activity.

"At no time during the operation were bandits, kidnappers, or terrorists arrested. Any attempt to link the arrested foreign nationals to violent crimes is false, misleading, and capable of causing unnecessary panic," the statement said.

The Commissioner reiterated the Command's commitment to the protection of lives and property across Ogun State, noting that intelligence-led operations, routine patrols, and other proactive security measures remain in place.

He urged residents of Ota, Ifo, Atan-Ota, Ijoko, Sango-Ota, Agbado, and surrounding communities to remain calm and continue their lawful activities without fear, assuring them that the security architecture across the state remains effective and responsive.

Ojajuni further appealed to members of the public to verify security-related information before sharing it, emphasizing that responsible communication is essential to maintaining public peace and confidence.

Editorial : Using Children as Bargaining Tools Must Stop

 

The recent kidnapping of children in Oyo State and their continued captivity have once again exposed a disturbing reality in Nigeria: the growing use of innocent children as bargaining tools by criminals, terrorists, and kidnappers. Nothing can be more reprehensible than turning children into commodities to be exchanged for ransom, political leverage, or criminal gain. It is a practice that violates every principle of humanity and undermines the very fabric of society.

For the affected families, each passing day is filled with anxiety, uncertainty, and despair. Parents are forced to endure the agonizing wait for news of their children while communities grapple with fear and insecurity. Yet, beyond the immediate pain lies a broader national concern. The continued use of children as hostages reflects a dangerous normalization of criminality and a weakening of the state's ability to protect its most vulnerable citizens.

Nigeria has witnessed a troubling rise in child abductions over the past decade. From the Chibok schoolgirls in 2014 to the mass kidnappings in Kankara, Jangebe, Birnin Yauri, and several communities across northern Nigeria, children have increasingly become targets for criminal groups seeking financial rewards or publicity. Schools, once regarded as safe havens for learning and development, have become scenes of terror and uncertainty.

The implications are far-reaching. Every child abducted is a child denied education, security, and the opportunity to enjoy a normal childhood. Many victims suffer severe psychological trauma, while some are subjected to forced labour, sexual exploitation, or recruitment into armed groups. Families often face financial ruin as they struggle to meet ransom demands, while communities lose confidence in the ability of government institutions to guarantee their safety.

The kidnapping of children should never be treated as an ordinary crime. It is an assault on the future of the nation. A society that cannot protect its children places its own future at risk. The persistent targeting of children discourages school attendance, weakens human capital development, and deepens social instability.

Government must therefore move beyond routine condemnations and demonstrate greater urgency in addressing this menace. Security agencies require improved intelligence capabilities, better equipment, and stronger coordination to prevent abductions before they occur. Schools and vulnerable communities must be provided with adequate protection, while those responsible for kidnapping children must face swift and severe punishment under the law.

At the same time, efforts to combat poverty, unemployment, and social exclusion must be intensified. While these factors do not justify criminal behaviour, they contribute to an environment in which kidnapping and banditry flourish. Long-term solutions must therefore combine effective security measures with meaningful socio-economic reforms.

The private sector, civil society organizations, religious bodies, traditional institutions, and community leaders must also play active roles in safeguarding children. Protecting children is not solely a government responsibility; it is a collective obligation shared by all stakeholders in society.

The children currently held captive in Oyo State, and countless others who have suffered similar experiences across Nigeria, deserve more than sympathy. They deserve freedom, protection, and justice. Their plight should serve as a wake-up call to a nation that can no longer afford to treat child abduction as another headline that will soon be forgotten.

Using children as bargaining tools must stop. It is a stain on our collective conscience and a threat to our national future. Until every Nigerian child can go to school, sleep at home, and move freely without fear of abduction, the country still has much work to do in fulfilling its most fundamental duty—the protection of its children.

CHILDREN HOSTAGES IN NIGERIA: THE CONTINUING CAPTIVITY OF OYO STATE SCHOOLCHILDREN AND THE NATIONAL CRISIS OF CHILD ABDUCTION

 

Abstract

By Patience Ogbo PhD 

The abduction and prolonged detention of children by criminal gangs, bandits, terrorists, and other non-state armed actors have emerged as one of the most serious human security challenges confronting Nigeria. The recent kidnapping of schoolchildren and teachers in Oyo State has once again highlighted the vulnerability of children and educational institutions to organized violence. Despite government assurances and ongoing security operations, many victims remain in captivity, reinforcing public perceptions of state incapacity in addressing the growing crisis. This paper examines the phenomenon of child hostage-taking in Nigeria within the broader context of insecurity, governance deficits, and socio-economic dislocation. It explores the historical evolution of child abductions, the factors driving the phenomenon, the impact on victims and communities, and the implications for national development. The study argues that child hostage-taking represents not only a security threat but also a humanitarian and developmental crisis requiring comprehensive policy interventions that combine security reforms, social protection, educational investment, and economic revitalization.

Keywords: Child Hostages, Kidnapping, Banditry, Terrorism, Human Security, Nigeria, Education, National Development.

1. Introduction

The recent abduction of schoolchildren and teachers in Oriire Local Government Area of Oyo State has rekindled national concerns regarding the safety and security of children in Nigeria. The incident, which resulted in the kidnapping of dozens of students and educational personnel, underscores the persistence of child hostage-taking as a recurring feature of Nigeria's security landscape. Weeks after the attack, reports indicating that some victims remained in captivity have heightened public anxiety and intensified criticism of governmental responses to kidnapping and organized criminal violence.

The Oyo State incident is not an isolated occurrence but part of a broader pattern that has increasingly characterized Nigeria's security environment over the past decade. Since the abduction of the Chibok schoolgirls in 2014, numerous cases involving the kidnapping of children from schools, villages, highways, and internally displaced persons' camps have been recorded. These incidents have transformed educational institutions from centers of learning into targets of criminal enterprise and insurgent violence.

This paper investigates the dynamics of child hostage-taking in Nigeria, examining its causes, manifestations, consequences, and policy implications. The paper adopts a multidisciplinary perspective, drawing from human security theory, conflict studies, and development literature to understand the growing crisis.

2. Conceptual Framework

2.1 Child Hostage-Taking

Child hostage-taking refers to the unlawful seizure and detention of persons below the age of eighteen for purposes such as ransom, political leverage, forced recruitment, labor exploitation, sexual exploitation, or intimidation of communities and governments. The practice constitutes a violation of international humanitarian law, international human rights law, and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.

2.2 Human Security Perspective

The concept of human security shifts attention from state-centered security concerns to the protection of individuals from threats to their survival, dignity, and well-being. Under this framework, the abduction of children represents a direct assault on personal security, educational security, psychological security, and community stability.

3. Historical Background of Child Abductions in Nigeria

Although kidnapping has existed in Nigeria for decades, the large-scale targeting of children gained prominence following the emergence of Boko Haram insurgency in the North-East. The 2014 Chibok abduction brought global attention to the vulnerability of schoolchildren and revealed significant weaknesses in state protection mechanisms.

Subsequent years witnessed an expansion of mass abductions across several northern states, including Kaduna, Zamfara, Katsina, Niger, Sokoto, Kebbi, and parts of the North-Central region. Criminal groups increasingly adopted kidnapping as a lucrative enterprise, exploiting weak governance structures, porous borders, widespread poverty, and inadequate security presence.

More recently, incidents in southern states, including Oyo State, suggest that the threat is spreading beyond traditional conflict zones, raising concerns about the nationalization of child hostage-taking as a criminal strategy.

4. Causes of Child Hostage-Taking

4.1 Weak State Capacity

One of the principal drivers of child abductions is the limited capacity of security institutions to provide effective protection across Nigeria's vast territory. Inadequate personnel, insufficient intelligence capabilities, logistical challenges, and poor coordination among agencies often create opportunities for criminal actors.

4.2 Economic Incentives

Kidnapping has evolved into a profitable criminal enterprise. Ransom payments, whether publicly acknowledged or not, provide substantial financial rewards for abductors. The economic logic of kidnapping encourages its continuation and expansion.

4.3 Terrorism and Insurgency

Terrorist organizations have used child abductions as instruments of propaganda, recruitment, coercion, and ideological control. Children are often forced into combat roles, domestic servitude, or marriage within insurgent groups.

4.4 Social and Economic Marginalization

Persistent poverty, unemployment, environmental degradation, and declining traditional livelihoods contribute to the growth of criminal networks. In many rural communities, insecurity is linked to broader socio-economic grievances and competition over scarce resources.

4.5 Educational Vulnerability

Schools located in remote and underserved communities frequently lack adequate security infrastructure. Their concentration of children makes them attractive targets for criminal groups seeking large numbers of hostages.

5. Impact on Children and Communities

5.1 Psychological Trauma

Children who survive captivity often experience severe psychological consequences, including post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety, and long-term emotional instability. Many struggle to reintegrate into normal social and educational environments.

5.2 Educational Disruption

The fear of abduction has led to widespread school closures and declining enrollment in many regions. Parents increasingly perceive schools as unsafe, contributing to Nigeria's already significant out-of-school population.

5.3 Family and Community Distress

The uncertainty surrounding abducted children imposes significant emotional and financial burdens on families. Communities affected by kidnappings often experience collective trauma, reduced social cohesion, and diminished trust in public institutions.

5.4 National Development Consequences

The targeting of children undermines human capital development, weakens educational outcomes, and compromises future economic productivity. Persistent insecurity discourages investment and exacerbates regional inequalities.

6. Government Responses and Their Limitations

The Nigerian government has implemented various measures, including military operations, enhanced intelligence gathering, school security initiatives, and partnerships with international organizations. The Safe Schools Initiative was designed to improve the protection of educational institutions and prevent future attacks.

Despite these efforts, recurring abductions suggest that existing responses remain insufficient. Rescue operations are often reactive rather than preventive. Weak accountability mechanisms, inadequate funding, corruption, and limited community engagement continue to undermine effectiveness.

The continuing captivity of abducted children, including recent victims in Oyo State, highlights the urgent need for more comprehensive and sustainable approaches.

7. Discussion

The persistence of child hostage-taking in Nigeria reflects deeper structural challenges beyond conventional security concerns. The phenomenon is rooted in governance deficits, socio-economic exclusion, institutional weaknesses, and unresolved conflicts. Security operations alone cannot eliminate the problem.

A human security approach emphasizes the interconnected nature of security, development, education, and social welfare. Protecting children requires addressing both immediate threats and the underlying conditions that enable criminal violence to flourish.

8. Recommendations

To effectively address child hostage-taking, the following measures are recommended:

Strengthening intelligence gathering and surveillance capabilities.

Expanding community-based security networks.

Enhancing school security infrastructure nationwide.

Increasing investment in rural development and job creation.

Providing comprehensive psychosocial support for rescued children.

Strengthening judicial processes and prosecution of kidnappers.

Improving interagency coordination among security institutions.

Expanding regional cooperation against transnational criminal networks.

Enhancing public accountability and transparency in security operations.

Implementing long-term educational protection strategies.

9. Conclusion

The continuing captivity of schoolchildren in Oyo State symbolizes a broader national tragedy that has affected thousands of Nigerian children over the past decade. Child hostage-taking has evolved into one of the most serious threats to human security, education, and national development in Nigeria. While military and law enforcement responses remain necessary, sustainable solutions require addressing the structural drivers of insecurity, poverty, exclusion, and institutional weakness.

Nigeria's future depends significantly on its ability to protect its children. Every child held hostage represents not only an individual tragedy but also a loss to the nation's collective aspirations for peace, development, and prosperity. The protection of children must therefore remain at the center of national security and development policy.

References

Aning, K., & Atta-Asamoah, A. (2020). Security Governance in West Africa. Accra: Kofi Annan International Peacekeeping Training Centre.

Human Rights Watch. (2024). World Report: Nigeria.

International Crisis Group. (2024). Ending Nigeria's Kidnapping Crisis.

United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF). (2024). Education Under Attack in Nigeria.

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2023). Human Development Report.

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2024). Global Study on Kidnapping.

World Bank. (2024). Fragility, Conflict and Violence Assessment: Nigeria.

This draft follows a standard academic structure with abstract, conceptual framework, literature context, analysis, recommendations, conclusion, and references suitable for expansion into a journal article, conference paper, master's dissertation chapter, or policy publication.

Selective Enforcement, Media Constraints, and Digital Expression in Nigeria: A Legal and Empirical Analysis of the Disproportiona

 

Title:

Selective Enforcement, Media Constraints, and Digital Expression in Nigeria: A Legal and Empirical Analysis of the Disproportionate Arrest of Bloggers and Activists compared to journalists 

Abstract

This study investigates the disproportionate arrest and prosecution of bloggers and activists in Nigeria compared to journalists. It combines legal analysis with a qualitative research approach to examine how lack of journalistic training, absence of balanced reporting, legal ambiguity, censorship, political patronage, and threats of violence shape enforcement patterns. The findings suggest that bloggers and activists are more vulnerable due to communicative practices that increase legal exposure, while journalists are constrained but protected within institutional frameworks. The study recommends legal reform and media literacy interventions to ensure equitable protection of free expression.

1. Introduction

Freedom of expression is constitutionally guaranteed under Section 39 of the . However, enforcement practices reveal a pattern of disproportionate arrests targeting bloggers and activists.

This study moves beyond descriptive analysis by incorporating empirical and methodological perspectives to explain this disparity.

2. Research Problem

Despite constitutional protections, bloggers and activists in Nigeria face higher risks of arrest for online expression than journalists. Existing explanations focus on legal and political factors but often overlook professional practices such as balance, verification, and training.

3. Research Questions

This study is guided by the following questions:

Why are bloggers and activists more frequently arrested than journalists in Nigeria?

What role does lack of journalistic training play in this disparity?

How does the absence of balanced reporting influence legal vulnerability?

To what extent do censorship, political patronage, and threats of violence shape journalistic practice?

How does selective enforcement of the  affect different categories of speakers?

4. Research Objectives

To analyze legal frameworks governing speech in Nigeria

To examine differences in professional practices between journalists and bloggers

To evaluate the role of balance and ethics in reducing legal risk

To assess structural constraints affecting media houses

To propose policy and legal reforms

5. Literature Review (Brief)

Scholars and reports by  and  highlight:

Declining press freedom

Use of cybercrime laws against critics

Increasing self-censorship

However, limited attention has been given to how lack of balance and training among bloggers contributes to enforcement outcomes, which this study addresses.

6. Methodology

6.1 Research Design

This study adopts a qualitative research design, combining:

Doctrinal legal analysis

Case study approach

Content analysis

6.2 Data Collection Methods

Document Analysis

Laws (Cybercrimes Act, Constitution)

Court cases

Reports from CPJ and RSF

Content Analysis

A comparative analysis of:

News reports by professional journalists

Social media posts/blog content by activists

Focus areas include:

Presence or absence of balance

Use of sources

Language tone (neutral vs emotive)

6.3 Sampling Technique

Purposive sampling is used to select:

10–15 news articles from established media houses

10–15 blog posts or activist content on similar issues

6.4 Data Analysis Method

The study uses thematic analysis, focusing on:

Balance vs imbalance

Verification practices

Legal risk indicators (defamation, accusations, tone)

7. Legal and Empirical Findings

7.1 Legal Ambiguity and Selective Enforcement

The Cybercrimes Act allows broad interpretation, enabling authorities to target individuals selectively.

7.2 Training and Knowledge Gap

Journalists demonstrate:

Awareness of legal risks

Use of protective language

Structured reporting

Bloggers and activists often lack:

Basic journalistic training

Knowledge of defamation laws

Awareness of legal consequences

7.3 Lack of Balance as a Risk Factor

Content analysis shows that bloggers and activists frequently:

Present one-sided narratives

Fail to include opposing views

Use accusatory or emotional language

This increases the likelihood of:

Defamation claims

Cybercrime charges

7.4 Censorship and Self-Censorship

Journalists operate under:

Regulatory pressure

Political influence

Economic dependence

This leads to self-censorship, reducing publication of high-risk investigative stories.

7.5 Political Patronage and Media Control

Dependence on government advertising and ownership structures limits editorial independence.

7.6 Violence and Fear

The killing of  and ongoing attacks documented by CPJ create a climate of fear that discourages aggressive reporting.

8. Discussion

The findings reveal a structural imbalance:

Journalists: constrained but protected

Bloggers/activists: expressive but vulnerable

The lack of balance among bloggers and activists emerges as a key factor that interacts with legal ambiguity to produce higher arrest rates.

9. Conclusion

The disproportionate arrest of bloggers and activists in Nigeria is the result of multiple interacting factors:

Vague legal provisions

Lack of journalistic training

Absence of balanced reporting

Media censorship and patronage

Threats of violence

Addressing this issue requires both legal reform and capacity building.

10. Recommendations

Amend vague provisions of the Cybercrimes Act

Promote media literacy and journalistic training for digital actors

Encourage balanced reporting practices

Strengthen independence of media institutions

Protect journalists and activists from harassment and violence

References (APA Style)

Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (1999).

Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) Act (2015).

. (2024). Attacks on the Press.

. (2024). World Press Freedom Index.

Freedom House. (2024). Freedom on the Net: Nigeria.

Theory

Law

Army Admits arresting Blogger Justice Crack , Says his interactions, exposure of Military information to public breaches Armed Forces Social Media Policy

 The Nigerian Army NA has admitted that it  arrested

a social media influencer, Justice Mark Chidiebere otherwise known as ‘justice crack’. A statement to that effect signed by Colonel Appolonia Anele, spokesperson to the Nigerian Army made available to The NewsDay said the social media influencer’s interaction with some soldiers with regard to welfare and related conditions of service and subsequent publication on the social media space runs fowl of extant military rules. According to her, “The attention of the Nigerian Army was drawn to the complaint made by some soldiers regarding their feeding and other matters relating to their welfare as posted on social media by a blogger/social media influencer, Justice Mark Chidiebere (Justice Crack).  While the matter is being investigated for breach of the Armed Forces’ Social Media Policy and an attempt to misinform the public, preliminary report reveals that the soldiers discussed wide range of issues with Justice Chidiebere who seemed to be inciting soldiers to create discontent within the system. An example was a chat bothering on subversion which Chidiebere had with the soldiers. It is important to state that a situation where civilians cultivate vulnerable personnel towards acts of subversion has far-reaching implications on discipline and national security. 

“Hence, Justice Chidiebere was picked by the Nigerian Army alongside the soldiers for investigation. While the soldiers remain in own custody, Chidiebere has been handed over to the relevant civil authorities for further investigation and possible prosecution. The Nigerian Army remains committed to the rule of law and will continue to collaborate with relevant agencies to ensure justice is served. We will continue to act within the ambits of the law in safeguarding our sovereignty.”